Posts Tagged ‘monitor’

Vehicle Tracking – How Vehicle Tracking Works

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

A business or consumer places a GPS tracking system inside or outside of the desired vehicle they wish to monitor. Many tracking systems have weather-resistant casing and magnetic mounts that give the user the flexibility and option of outside placement. The tracking systems can be powered by an internal power source such as a standard alkaline or lithium ion battery pack, or can be hardwired to the vehicle to direct power. Cigarette lighter adapter options are available for most models. The data from the tracking system can be manually downloaded to a computer via USB port or transmitted over a cellular network live, depending on whether the device is a passive or real-time tracking system.

Passive Tracking

Providing a cost-effective approach to vehicle tracking, passive devices allow users to monitor assets without having to pay a monthly fee. Since passive devices do not transmit data and only receive GPS coordinates, second-by-second tracking features are common. When the user wants to review the recorded data they simply remove the GPS tracking system from the vehicle and manually download the data via USB port.

Real-Time Tracking

For consumers needing to monitor a vehicle while in transit a real-time tracking system is the only solution. Login to a secured website, enter a user identification and password, and then access the GPS tracking data from home, office or smart phone. The vehicle tracking data is easily accessed and recorded to secure servers for future access.

Why is Vehicle Tracking the Solution for Me?

Whether you’re a large or small business, law enforcement agency, concerned parent of a teenager, or simply need a GPS tracking system for personal tracking, theft recovery, or family member with a physical or mental disability, the assurance vehicle tracking technology provides is priceless. GPS tracking systems allow users to easily and accurately access data that can increase productivity, help in routing, and supply answers to the unknown.

Are Surveillance Cameras Effective in Public? Private Property?

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

surveillance-cameraAn issue often debated by the public is surveillance cameras, and whether they are legally or invasively used by the government in public places, and on private property by private citizens.

In Vancouver, British Columbia, volunteers are taking up the cause. They are fanning out in the central business district and photographing and documenting every government-placed video surveillance camera. They are noting every surveillance camera on a map, which be available to the public in order to prompt discussion.

These volunteers believe that people will be surprised just how many surveillance cameras there are in public places, and they would be surprised where they are placed. The group is curious about public reaction: will it be one of comfort (surveillance cameras are protecting them from crime) or discomfort (surveillance cameras cross a line of privacy.)

Or is it somewhere in-between? What’s the government going to do with its surveillance footage? Catching a mugger on surveillance video is one thing. Using the surveillance video to bust jaywalkers and litterbugs is quite another. What if a man and women were recorded strolling in a romantic rendezvous? Who would have access to such surveillance footage?

Some say surveillance cameras are a strong deterrent to crime. In Salt Lake City, Utah, police said drug dealings at Pioneer Park were virtually eradicated after installing a series of surveillance cameras. It was well-advertised in signs at the park that the green space was under 24-hour surveillance.

Some people will argue that the surveillance didn’t stop drug dealing, it just moved on somewhere else to become someone else’s problem.

When people know that they’re under the watchful gaze of a surveillance camera, they will usually conform to expectations. For instance, we know toll booths, ATMs and gas station checkout counters are equipped for surveillance video. Ordinary people who generally follow the straight and narrow wouldn’t dream of willfully committing a crime in these surveillance areas – unless, of course, they are wearing a disguise.

Surveillance Cameras in Private Use

Are surveillance cameras helpful in deterring crime when used in a private home or business? Do surveillance images help apprehend criminals?

Probably fewer than one in 10 American homes is equipped with a surveillance system, though that number is growing, as surveillance systems become more cost-effective and versatile. Any home invader should be conscious of the fact that his crime might be recorded. The question is where that surveillance camera is covertly placed. Manufacturers are coming up with clever solutions for home surveillance, with cameras being installed in art pieces, lamps, clocks, books and dozens of other household objects. Surveillance systems for the home are also more durable than they were in years past. Many are weather-resistant, tamper-resistant, have large memory storage and professional-quality resolution.

Two incidents that happened in the United States within days of each other prove that home surveillance systems are useful for catching bad guys.

In Las Cruces, N.M., a man and two juveniles were arrested for home burglary after a homeowner’s surveillance system caught them committing the act. In Jefferson County, MO., a home surveillance camera recorded three men who are suspects in a series of neighborhood car break-ins.

In the first case, police investigating a home burglary found an empty, unlocked residence. Once the owner returned to check the home, he reported two guns, two video cameras, two laptop computers and a professional-grade digital camera missing. The owner informed police that he had a surveillance camera operating at the time inside the house. He installed it because he had been a victim of burglary before.

The surveillance footage showed three men who were recognized by police as residents of a nearby mobile home park. Questioning soon led to the arrest of the three.

A police officer said that without the surveillance footage, the investigative team had no substantial leads. There was no evidence of break-in (a babysitter left the home unlocked), no fingerprints, no footprints, and no witnesses. The surveillance footage gave police “full, close-up pictures of the suspects as they passed before the camera.”

In the second case in Missouri, about 10 vehicles in the same subdivision were burglarized overnight. Laptops, CDs, digital cameras, GPS systems, and sound systems were stolen. A neighbor’s outdoor home surveillance system kicked investigations into high gear. It showed three men suspiciously eyeing the surveillance system owner’s Camaro, about the same time as the other car burglaries. The surveillance recording was turned over to police and they have broadcast it to the public in an attempt to identify the suspects.

Many neighbors now say that they are shopping for home surveillance systems.

What to Look For

When shopping for a home surveillance system, consumers should first consider whether they want one that streams live (real-time), or one that records surveillance video for later viewing (passive). The majority of homeowners will choose a passive surveillance system because of its ease of use and practicality.

Price is also an important consideration. Many manufacturers will make several versions of surveillance products with several price points to attract a wider array of customers. Home surveillance systems vary from discount-store pricing to professional-grade surveillance.

Surveillance systems come in many types and have a number of different features. Most surveillance systems will be motion activated, have a time/date stamp, and have the ability to record in low-light situations. Potential surveillance camera buyers should decide if they want a wireless or wired system and test image resolution in variable light.

The most basic of surveillance cameras are simple bullet cameras, also called lipstick cameras. They get the name because of their short, cylindrical shape, about 2 inches. They usually have a fixed position lens and a fixed focus. These cameras are good for small spaces where there is a specific spot where surveillance recording is needed: (around a safe, car, baby’s high chair, front door, etc.)

Dome cameras usually have pan, tilt and zoom control. They usually have a mirrored or smoky globe so that, even if a subject notices the surveillance, they do not know if the equipment is directly facing and recording them.

Motion-activated, covert surveillance cameras are a third category of home protection. These tiny, compact surveillance systems are hidden in everyday household objects such as books, clocks and lamps for indoors and mailboxes and bird houses for outdoor use.

Court Sides with Employer in Hidden Camera Case

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

flagBusiness owners scored a small victory in August, when the California Supreme Court ruled that a corporation was justified in using a hidden surveillance camera.

Two women workers, Maria-Jose Lopez and Abigail Hernandez, had brought suit against Hillsides Inc., a nonprofit that runs a group home for battered children in Pasadena, Calif. The women said they were horrified and alarmed when they discovered their employer had been running a surveillance camera in the office they shared. One woman said she used the office often to change into gym clothes after work and the other admitted there were occasions when she showed her coworker parts of her body, proving that she had lost weight after pregnancy.

Hillsides’ executive director set up the hidden camera in an attempt to catch an employee who allegedly was downloading pornography from a corporation computer.

At issue was not so much whether the employer had a right in this case to set up a surveillance camera in the workplace. The court agreed that Hillsides had reason to suspect an illegal activity by an employee; and that the activity, if unchecked, might cause harm to clients, customers or employees.

The ruling more accurately stemmed from whether the women’s rights were violated because the placement of the surveillance camera was in a semi-secluded office where they expected some level of privacy.

The potential good (the surveillance camera exposing dangerous behavior) far outweighed any potential harm to employees.

The court failed to make a blanket statement that surveillance cameras were okay in the workplace. In fact, statements were quite to the contrary, indicating the issue of surveillance cameras in the workplace is bound to be debated in the future and considered on a case-by-case basis.

The main justice who wrote the opinion for the California Supreme Court said that the court did not intend to encourage employers to install secret surveillance systems, but said that employers do have a right to monitor company computers to see that they are not being misused.

In support of employees, justices also seemed to suggest that hidden surveillance camera use would be highly questionable, even illegal, in rest rooms, dressing rooms and showers, where modesty is still at stake. In some surveillance camera cases, voyeurism is the intent; not crime prevention or misuse of company time or property.

But in the Hillsides case, the taping was done late at night, when the office should have been empty. No one but the executive director operated the surveillance camera. He came into the office specifically to turn it on and off. The women feared that they were taped, but they never were, and there was no embarrassment or disciplinary action to them, resulting from the surveillance.

An attorney for the women argued that employees should have been told that the area had a surveillance camera and that their actions may be recorded. The defense said it would defeat the purpose of the surveillance – to catch a pornographer who was likely one of the employees.

The conclusion in this case was that surveillance was limited, and the hidden camera was used for a good reason.

The alleged pornographer was never found and it is not known whether he or she is still an employee. The surveillance camera was disabled and Hillsides has installed Internet monitoring software that blocks employee access to offensive Web sites. Another computer surveillance solution is computer keyloggers, which record keystrokes. By monitoring what the employee is typing, keyloggers reveal text messages, e-mails and Web downloads.

Try Out Spy Skills With Pen Camcorders

Monday, July 20th, 2009

You don’t have to be “good” or “evil” to be a spy. You don’t even necessarily have to be clever or smart.

Take a look at today’s electronic surveillance equipment and it becomes obvious that there’s only one prerequisite to super spydom: All you have to be is a gadget geek.

Forty years ago, television secret agent Maxwell Smart had a phone built into his shoe. It was a gimmick. Today the consumer needs only to hop on the Internet or enter a retail spy store and they’ll find shoes equipped with GPS tracking, neckties with built-in audio recorders and ball point pens with tiny, mini hidden camcorders. Better still, the items work, and they usually work well.

The world of spy or surveillance technology is equal parts useful and fun. Ordinary people can buy and use the same professional-grade covert surveillance equipment as law enforcement personnel, government agents and personal investigators. People can spend anywhere from $70 or $80 to several thousands of dollars on surveillance equipment.

Why would consumers invest in surveillance equipment such as nanny cams, hidden camera alarm clocks, “bionic” listening devices or key loggers? Some people simply want to catch the harmless antics of a co-worker or family member. Some users desire to “get the goods” on someone, when that suspect doesn’t know they are being watched. Others have a personal need to confirm suspicions that someone they know or love is involved in illegal or undesirable activities. (more…)

Home Surveillance System ‘Catches’ Murder Suspects

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Security monitorPENSACOLA, FL – Police gained important clues about the July 9 murder of a wealthy Florida couple from surveillance cameras that were installed in and around their home.

Byrd and Melanie Billings of Beulah, a well-to-do couple who were raising 16 children, were each shot several times as they slept in the bedroom of their home. One motive was robbery, claim Escambia County police.

The hidden camera system was key to the arrest of six men and one juvenile within a week of the murder. From the video footage, police were able to get physical descriptions for many of the suspects, despite the fact that they were wearing black ninja-style clothing and masks. The surveillance cameras also picked up a clear image of the weapons and a getaway car.

As is true of many homeowners who have property in remote areas, the Billingses sought to protect it and their family with a sophisticated security camera system. The couple and their large brood of children, 12 of whom are adopted, lived near the woods. Every room in their large home, and the property outside, was wired with motion-activated surveillance cameras. The cameras were installed not only for security from intruders, but also so the parents could keep an eye on the children. Most had special needs including Down syndrome and autism.

In custody for the crime are: Wayne Coldiron, 41; Leonard Gonzalez, 56; Leonard Gonzalez Jr., 35; Gary Lamont Sumner, 30; Fredrick Lee Thornton, 19; Donald Ray Stallworth, 28; and an unnamed, 16-year-old juvenile. The Gonzalez men are father and son. An eighth suspect is still at large, police said.

The couple owned several businesses, including a financial company and used car lot. They often opened up their home for philanthropic events.

People around the small town near Pensacola are shocked, not only because the Billingses were referred to by many as “angels” for their generous dispositions, but that the deaths were so brutal.

Police said the attack was organized, swift and precise, suggesting that it was practiced like a military maneuver. Surveillance camera footage shows a team of people, driving up to the home in an old, red van from the 1970s or 1980s. Three men got out of the van and entered from the front door. A different surveillance camera captured the image of two other men, coming out of the woods and entering a back utility door that was apparently unlocked. One suspect might have tried to disable the surveillance system, but failed.

From the time and date stamp on the surveillance tape, police determined that the group was on the property for less than 10 minutes. And although the house was large with nine bedrooms, the robbers maneuvered in and out in only four minutes. A safe was taken from the property. None of the nine children who were home at the time of the murder were hurt.

Escambia County Sheriff David Morgan said police were aware of the family’s video surveillance system and that the suspects might have had the same knowledge. Many people use surveillance cameras for security because they own summer homes in Florida or travel frequently on business.

In the case of the Billingses, the surveillance cameras provided key evidence that led to quick arrests.

Police have not found a relationship link between any of the suspects to the couple, except to assume that at least one has been on the property before. Some of the suspects worked together in a car detailing business.

The couple had been married for 18 years.